• 23Nov
    positions Comments Off

    I think this site has done its bit in bring the unfair practices of Batelco in regards to the limits and pricing of their internet packages to the world. It has also served as a platform to educate us of what the offers elsewhere in the world are, and allowed us to exert some pressure on Batelco.

    However, I believe that the function of this site has now expired. We have done everything that we could to bring these issues to the fore, but unfortunately we were unable to get Batelco to change its policies and utilise its sole position in Bahrain to provide a world class service at a reasonable cost. They obviously look at this from a purely business view and they believe that maximising their profits at the expense of their captured market is the right thing to do.

    It is not. It never will be.

    It is our hope that Batelco’s competition will flourish and will provide alternatives to our choice as consumers with better technologies, packages and better prices for us to choose from.

    When that happens, I personally assure you that I shall be the first to drop Batelco in the favour of their competition on principle.

    Batelco, as demonstrated by them over the past few months, have never been loyal to the people of this country, and have taken us for granted that they can and will milk us for everything that we have, without any oversight whatsoever from the Bahraini government.

    Thank you very much our friends for your continued support.

    Although this site will no longer be updated, it shall remain available to serve as a historical record of our struggle to provide a better and cheaper internet service to the people and residents of Bahrain.

    Thank you.

  • 19Sep

    price comparison between batelco jordan and bahrain
    comparison chart of Batelco’s Internet access fees in Jordan and Bahrain

    Doesn’t this comparison make your blood boil? Doesn’t it look like Batelco has been and will continue to take the place it calls its headquarters, the country that nourished it for a ride? Doesn’t that look like Batelco is biting the hand that feeds it? Don’t they look nothing less than vampires?

    Of course it does and they don’t particularly care… after all, what’s the alternative?

  • 15Jun

    The TRA has ordered Batelco to stop advertising its BD10 ADSL package immediately, appologise to those who registered, refund any monies collected and issue a press release saying:

    “Batelco has today been ordered by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority to cease to offer a BD 10 per month, 256 kbits/s DSL package. This is because Batelco failed to meet its obligations under the Telecommunications Law and its License. Batelco apologizes to its consumers in that it has misled them through the advertisements issued that it could offer such packages when it was aware that it could not do so legally. This announcement is issued persuant to the order to the Authority.”
    TRA Order 1/06 :: 14 May ‘06

    It would be quite nice and appropriate that Order 2/06 would tell Batelco to remove the threshold limits on the other recent packages it introduced.

    other referencesTRA blocks Batelco package :: GDN 15/06/06

  • 13Jun

    As I’m going to be on a short business trip and won’t be here on the 15th, I have taken the liberty in summarising the points raised in the TRA RFC topic and sent them an email outlining our position.

    Here is what I submitted:

    I have attached the responses to your RFC which we posted on our site: http://boycottbatelco.com, to read the up-to-date comments and suggestions, please go to: http://boycottbatelco.com/?p=54

    Our view of the RFC is that:

    1. As it is intended specifically for the new Batelco ADSL packages situation, and
    2. As we have been discussing this very issue for weeks now,

    we do not see the value of personalizing the complaint procedure, as providing individual CPRs and personal information would make of the process. We also suggest that as the issue is defined (our objection to the threshold limits) then the TRA need not mount another procedure in order to initiate formal complaint investigation with Batelco. The information has already been provided by the various emails and faxes the TRA has received from named individuals, as well as concerned people who chose to be anonymous for their own reasons.

    The issue is that there is a specific complaint against Batelco in it imposing a threshold limit on what were open packages, and its forced migration of subscribers to the new packages, even though their supply contract stipulates that Batelco can change the terms and conditions of the provided service with little or no notice to its subscribers.

    Taking the above into consideration, as well as the attached responses gathered from our website, we feel that the proposed complaint procedure against the recently announced Batelco ADSL packages as not necessary; however we continue to urge the TRA to resolve the matter as soon as possible as we see the current restrictions as unfair and detrimental to the pursuit of the individual’s quality of life with all that entails.

    Should you wish to provide Batelco with signatories in support of this argument, please point them to http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?bhr where 4,997 individuals signified their objection by signing the aforementioned petition.

    We look forward to your response, and sincerely thank you for your efforts in attempting to resolve the matter.

    Kind regards,
    Mr. Mahmood Al-Yousif

    for the Boycott Batelco Initiative
    http://boycottbatelco.com

  • 07Jun

    With 4733 signatures when I checked last! It is now owned and as far as I can tell there is no threat for it to be removed.

    If you haven’t already, please consider signing the petition and make your voice count.

« Previous Entries